FEATURE
RodTonna Barthet
CA
O
BUSIN
N
E
UK
L
E
W
C
A
C
O
FF
A
N
O
R
O
R
B
M
D
O
S
Y
A
N
S
?
a
real
ssess equipment
a research
change
the current
in mot
le
ion
vel
, we
of wil
recently
lingness
publ
to
ished
set
the
than
running
to
cost
grow
s must
,57%
be
of
the
firms
same
said
or
that
lower
the
environmental
report intoUK companies’
Brit
It off
internat
TheStern
iciallyl
ional
Review
ink
debate
mark
on
ed
climate
a watershed
Change.
in
investment
attitudes and their
not
ish
standard
have
businesses
equipment. And a quarter of
the
said that they simplydo
init
equipment.
in
Our
low-emission
research wa
technology
s conducted
and
equipmentwith
capital
environmental
to replaceexist
lyfriend
ing
benef
iatives with
ed
long-
carbon
term
reduction
amongst alternatives
ly
collect
it,
ive
rather
will to
than
‘do
an
good’
organisat
commercial
.At
ion’s d
that this work was
the sametime them
irectors
a
about
at
representat
over
ivesampleof senior
their
600
mot
UK
ivat
f
ions
irms.
for
We
invest
asked
businesses
So, the
certainly
overal
.
lmessage
wants to
is
invest
thatUK
domain
in low emission technology, as wel
ing
greener
United Nat
,new
ions
datawa
relea
s also
sed
issued
into the
by
publ
the
ic
views on the obstacles to such
las their
clear
infrastructure, but there must
in
bea
emission of greenhouse
showing
ga
an
ses
upwardtrend in It turnedout that the picture
investments.
must
business case for doing so. Attention
de
encouraging,but we also revealed
wa
some
s quite
barriers
urgently
,in other
turn
words
to removingthese
countries
velopment
must
for
shoulder
whichSir Nichola
- a
s said rich serious incent
responsibility
most of the low-emission
barriersto a significant increase in
friendly
ives
equipment.
to invest in
There
environmental
,providing greater
aremanyarea
ly-
Prime Minister
.The thenChancellor, now first issue the
equipment
research addressed
investment. The
which could beaddressed;
s
UK wouldlead
,
the
Gordon
internat
Brown promisedthe measurement- a critical f
was
experience,one
but in my
tackle climatechange. In part
ional response to usefulinitiatives can beput
irst step before
is the uneven
of the most important issues
announced
surprisingly, the majority of companies
in place. Not
Government simply
applicat
must
ion of tax breaks.
commission
the creation of a new
icular, he
found to measure
were
anomaliesover tax treatment.
iron out
There
the
investment in
to
‘green’
spearheadBritish company factors -
some emission-relevant
employee
power
mileage
consumpt
(61%)
ion (54%)and bea movetowards
should
application
more consistent
key way
Certainly
s that
,
companies
in pract
technology
ical terms,
.
one of the because specific technology
of capital
categories
allowances from
energyefficient and/or emit
can
lower
become
le
more cost
these have an immed
- presumably
iateimpact on
vehicles) to the inclusion of all
(such as
greenhousegases is to re-investin
vels of one
s
their
in
.
overal
four
More
f
l
irms
signif
carbon
(26%)
icantly
footprint.
also
, howe
now
ver,was that
equipmentand IT that is specifically
new plant, H
measure categories meeting
equipment
designed
carbon footprint
owever, standards.
definedlow-emission
initiat
for this purpose. The other main between
measurementvaries widely
introduce
ive that
internal
companies can take is to some industries
different
turning
business sectors, with problem.
Limited
There
product
simply
ranges is also posing a
that both
disciplines to makesure 10-15%(Educat
in figuresas low as ‘green’ equipmentto invest
is not
in!
enough suitably
wastage,be
organisat
it energy
ion and staff reduce Hospitality).At
ion
the
, Manufacturing, Manufacturers
DrGarryFelgate,
,water or consumables. high proportions mea
other
sure
end of the scale, extend their environmental
must beencouraged
ly-friend
to
government
footprint
products; and equally,vendors should
ly
manycompanies
-funded
a director
can
Carbon
of
cut energy
Trust,
the
use
say
by
s that (57%),
encouragedto make
be
H
(44%).
IT &
in
ICT
Aerospace
(47%)and
(78%),
overal
Financial
Publ
lcarbon
ishing
Services more ea
equipmentfinance
more environmental
silyavailable,
ly
so that upgradingto
thinking,
is views also chime with theGovernment’
30%.
s
need
in that he highlights the urgent two
S
fifths
econd
of
ly
Brit
, we asked aboutrealaction - does
eff
they had
ish firms (41%)stated that major
not
(and,
mean
as our
the buy
-friend
erhas
ly
to
equipment
absorb a
example
icient
for corporate
equipment;
Britain
that the most
and he
to
highl
buymore
ights the reduction
implemented
rules,and 37%
carbon
claimed
emission confirmed,
research respondents
air equipmentcan beas
modern
much a
compressed invested in
to have outlay
often unaffordable)capital
efficient than oldermodels.
s 40%more business
low carbon/energy-efficient help buy
. F
ers
inancing
spread
tools
payment
such
s
a
over
s leasing
a
can
then highl
equipment.
ightedsignif
Crucially, respondents of years
period
signif
However, we have alreadyseen a investment that must be
icant
addressed
barriersto such
take
icant proportion of businesses do not proport
that
R
were
emoving
.
ident
the
ified
barriers
in our research,
to investment
do, there
climatechange seriously.Of those who ac
ion of companies taking useful
if the
action the
which
higher
celerates. For instance, they stated that vendors
joint efforts of equipmentmanufacturers
through
,
taken by
mea
is
the
sures
little
business
the
or no
le
community
vel
research
of posit
yet
ive
available
so
act
far
ion investment
costs, lack of a clear return-on- undoubted
,financiers
despitethe extent of
, areseen a
(ROI) and limitedproduct range ‘greening’ of
lyhave a
and
massive
Government,
impact on
wil
the
l
announcements around
corporate
the issue. In orderto
investment
s the consequently
Brit
equipment.
in
For
low
principal
investment
carbon/energy
obstacles to further
in such
-efficient environment for
helping
ish business
e
to create
,and
a better
www.siemens.co.uk/f
veryone.
inancialservices
20| SUSTAINABLEFM|FEBRUARY2008
Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40