MAILBOX
I am an 83-year-old American architect who was born in the French concession of Shanghai. I lived 16 years in China, speak Mandarin, Shanghainese and the Szu-chuan dialects to this day. I am disappointed Ms. Shen failed to mention the “American architect in Shanghai,” Mr. Elliott Hazzard, who arrived in Shanghai in 1920 and died in 1943 in that city in a Japanese civilian internment camp during WWII [“Shanghai: Sino Deco,” Spring 2008]. Hazzard designed the following in Shanghai: Brookside Apartments on Ave. Haig; addition to Wing-On department store on Nanking Rd.; Haig Court apartments on Ave. Haig; Judge Franklin residence; the American Columbia Country Club on Great Western Ave. Hazzard did many more Shanghai projects, all in the Art Deco heritage.
–William Krisel, A.I.A., Los Angeles, CA
As a ceramist and advertiser in your magazine, I was a dismayed to read of the “death of craft,” which took place in the ‘90s, according to Garth Clark [“Looking Forward, Looking Back,” Spring 2008]. His analysis of the changes of the last 20 years is self-serving, since he has built his career and his gallery’s success on that view. I would like to suggest that if contemporary design is now, as he states, “creative, diverse and playful with materials,” it is because artists who began working with materials as craftsmen broke the stranglehold of tradition and showed contemporary industrial designers that they could do it, too. As a ceramist working in porcelain, it has always been the challenge of executing a design with only my hands and a few tools that has made it compelling, not only for myself but for the many clients who buy and enjoy my work. If the craft movement is dead, someone should tell the three or four thousand ceramists, curators, teachers, collectors and gallery owners who attended the recent National Council on Education for the Ceramic Arts (NCECA) conference in Pittsburgh and filled the city with clay work, including pottery. Someone should tell the people at the Philadelphia Museum of Art who organize the Craft Show every year, the artists who participate and the thousands who come to buy treasures for their homes. Someone should tell them, but I don’t think it would stop them. I hope it won’t stop your readers either.
–Elizabeth Lurie, Farmington Hills, MI
After receiving my Spring issue of Modernism, I was happy to find one article concerning John Lautner’s work and another mentioning Michael Lafetra and his architectural acquisitions. Lautner’s Schaffer residence was open for public view on April 6, and I was excited to experience it once again. I first visited La Crescenta Park, a public mountain preserve a few blocks from the residence. The preserve gave me a sense of the original building site with its big leaf canopies of thick oaks. As I arrived at the house, I could see the horizontal redwood fences that become the walls of the home when glass spacers are added to the openings. I found myself returning again and again to the kitchen and living room to “feel” the one great flowing space with just a minimum sense of shelter. It is one of the masterworks of the 1950s. It’s enjoyable to read about a collection of John Lautner’s work. Thanks for the articles.
–Lynn Call, A.I.A., Los Angeles, CA
Regarding the article “Dessau: Bauhaus Legacy,” [Spring 2008] by Patricia Harris and David Lyon, the reader is likely to have the impression that the 1976 restoration of the Bauhaus buildings was limited to the glass walls. Although the present administration of the buildings is loathe to give credit to the former communist German Democratic Republic, the 1976 restoration included the exterior and graphics, interiors, door hardware, lighting fixtures and auditorium seating. In fact, several of the spherical door knobs and their wall receptacles recreated in ’76 have been damaged and not replaced. Given the socialist leanings of the Bauhaus faculty and students, the GDR committed to the costly restoration project to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the original construction and to demonstrate the “socialist” influence of Bauhaus design. The major addition to the buildings after reunification was the interior color scheme, inspired by [De Stijl painter and art theorist] Theo van Doesburg.
–Robert Smith, Fillmore, CA
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132